When reviewing work performance data, which metric would NOT typically be analyzed?

• A. Start and finish dates of activities
• B. Number of change requests
• C. Estimated project costs
• D. Number of defects

Answer: (C)

When reviewing work performance data, estimated project costs would not typically be analyzed as a direct metric of current performance. Instead, work performance data primarily focuses on actual outcomes and results of the project's execution. Metrics such as start and finish dates of activities, number of change requests, and number of defects provide real-time insights into how well the project is performing against its schedule, scope, and quality standards.

Start and finish dates give insight into schedule adherence and whether the project is on track or experiencing delays. The number of change requests reflects how well the project is managing scope changes and client feedback, indicating potential areas of concern requiring attention. The number of defects is critical for assessing quality and ensuring that the deliverables meet the required standards.

In contrast, estimated project costs are usually dealt with in the context of project planning and budgeting rather than as a measure of current performance. They provide projections based on expected expenditures but do not reflect what has actually occurred, which is the primary focus when analyzing work performance data.